Detailed Policy Positions

Berkeley is facing overlapping pressures: rising housing costs, climate impacts, aging infrastructure, institutional expansion, public frustration with city responsiveness, and a growing sense that many residents are being priced out of the future of the city they helped build.

Southside sits at the center of many of these pressures. It absorbs density, regional transit demand, student turnover, nightlife impacts, institutional expansion, and infrastructure strain, often without receiving proportional investment in maintenance, public amenities, stabilization, or long-term neighborhood planning.

I believe Berkeley needs governance that is grounded, transparent, practical, and accountable to the people who actually live here.

The goal is not just growth. The goal is a city that remains livable, functional, resilient, and connected for the people who call it home.

Climate and Infrastructure

What’s happening now

Berkeley is already experiencing the effects of climate change through hotter temperatures, aging infrastructure, stormwater stress, and increased pressure on public systems. At the same time, many everyday infrastructure problems remain unresolved for years, including sidewalk conditions, drainage issues, street deterioration, and gaps in shade and cooling infrastructure.

Southside in particular experiences intense daily use from residents, students, workers, transit riders, and visitors, but often lacks the level of maintenance and infrastructure investment that density requires.

What needs to change

Climate resilience should improve everyday life, not exist as a separate planning category disconnected from residents’ actual experience.

Berkeley should focus on practical infrastructure improvements that make neighborhoods safer, cooler, cleaner, and more resilient while preparing for long-term environmental pressures.

That includes:

  • Upgrading stormwater and street infrastructure

  • Expanding shade, cooling, and green space

  • Supporting clean energy and efficient buildings

  • Improving sidewalk conditions and accessibility

  • Prioritizing infrastructure investments in high-use areas like Southside

Climate planning should be visible in the daily experience of living in Berkeley, not just in long-term reports and targets.

Aidan Hill smiling standing in front of a table with a sign that reads "disaster kit kitchen free food" at an outdoor event. The table has a water pitcher and other items. Other people are in the background under the tent.

Housing and Stability

What’s happening now

Southside has increasingly been treated as a place to absorb growth without receiving proportional investment in affordability, infrastructure, public amenities, or neighborhood stabilization.

Rising land values, speculative pressure, and institutional expansion continue to push out long-term residents, students, workers, artists, and lower-income community members. Many residents feel like they are carrying the costs of growth while receiving fewer of the benefits.

At the same time, Berkeley faces real housing shortages that cannot simply be ignored.

What needs to change

Housing policy should focus not only on production, but on stability, preservation, and neighborhood livability.

Growth should not function as a transfer of burden onto existing residents. New development should contribute to infrastructure, affordability, maintenance, public amenities, and long-term neighborhood stability.

That includes:

  • Building below-market-rate housing that fits neighborhood conditions

  • Strengthening tenant protections and preventing displacement

  • Supporting housing options for students, workers, families, and long-term residents

  • Exploring preservation and acquisition strategies that keep housing permanently affordable

  • Ensuring major development contributes to neighborhood infrastructure and quality of life

Housing policy should be measured not only by units built, but by whether people can continue living in the communities they helped create.

Aidan smiling, wearing safety goggles, gloves, and a green vest with CERT logo, holding a field operations guide book, in a classroom setting with a man in a CERT uniform sitting at a table, a screen displaying a thank you message and CERT logo.

Public Health and Safety

What’s happening now

Residents are frustrated by visible disorder, inconsistent maintenance, untreated mental health crises, unsafe traffic conditions, and gaps in city responsiveness. Many people feel caught between systems that rely too heavily on emergency response while failing to invest enough in prevention and long-term stabilization.

At the same time, trust in institutions has eroded across many communities.

What needs to change

Public safety should not be reduced to reaction alone. Safer neighborhoods are built through maintenance, stability, accessibility, mental health support, responsive infrastructure, and strong community trust.

Berkeley should focus on practical improvements that reduce harm before crises escalate.

That includes:

  • Investing in clean streets, lighting, maintenance, and public sanitation

  • Expanding access to mental health and outreach services

  • Supporting crisis response systems connected to care and stabilization

  • Improving pedestrian and traffic safety

  • Prioritizing prevention alongside emergency response

  • Building public trust through transparency and accountability

People should feel safe using public space, walking through their neighborhood, riding transit, and accessing city services.

Public Space and Community Life

What’s happening now

Public space in Berkeley is increasingly under pressure from privatization, disinvestment, competing institutional interests, and uneven maintenance. At the same time, public gathering spaces remain essential to neighborhood identity, civic life, recreation, culture, and democratic participation.

Southside especially needs public space that is functional, welcoming, accessible, and actively maintained.

What needs to change

Public land should serve the public first.

Parks, sidewalks, plazas, gathering spaces, and civic commons are not secondary amenities. They are part of the social infrastructure of the city.

Berkeley should invest in maintaining and improving public spaces while ensuring communities have a meaningful role in shaping how those spaces evolve.

That includes:

  • Maintaining parks, sidewalks, and public gathering areas

  • Improving accessibility and usability of public space

  • Supporting programming that brings neighbors together

  • Ensuring public land decisions reflect community priorities

  • Expanding amenities like seating, shade, bathrooms, and maintenance infrastructure

  • Protecting spaces that contribute to neighborhood identity and public life

A healthy city is one where people can comfortably exist in public without needing to purchase access to community.

A person wearing a black mask with a green hummingbird and the words 'VOTE AIDAN FOR MAYOR' takes a selfie, holding a sign that reads "Berkeley is a union town." Behind them is a mural with a large banner that says 'Support Moes Union' and smaller posters supporting Berkeley's union town status.

Economic and Small Business Support

What’s happening now

Small businesses in Berkeley face rising rents, permitting complexity, infrastructure challenges, changing consumer patterns, and inconsistent city responsiveness. Commercial corridors like Telegraph are economically important, but many businesses feel unsupported despite contributing heavily to neighborhood identity and activity.

What needs to change

Berkeley should make it easier for neighborhood-serving businesses to survive, adapt, and remain rooted locally.

Economic policy should focus on stability, walkability, accessibility, cleanliness, and reducing unnecessary friction for small operators.

That includes:

  • Reducing unnecessary bureaucratic barriers for small businesses

  • Supporting local hiring and neighborhood-serving jobs

  • Maintaining clean, accessible commercial corridors

  • Improving infrastructure around business districts

  • Supporting small businesses adapting to changing neighborhood conditions

  • Strengthening connections between economic activity, transit, housing, and public space planning

Strong neighborhood commercial corridors are part of what makes Berkeley feel alive and connected.

Aidan engaged in a conversation in front of information boards about flooding.

Accountability and City Services

What’s happening now

Many residents feel disconnected from city government and unsure whether projects, timelines, and public commitments are actually being followed through consistently. Communication often becomes reactive, fragmented, or difficult to track.

People deserve clearer expectations and better visibility into how decisions are made.

What needs to change

City government should be understandable, measurable, and responsive.

Residents should be able to see:

  • what the city is doing,

  • why decisions are being made,

  • what progress is happening,

  • and where problems still exist.

That includes:

  • Providing regular public updates on housing, infrastructure, and services

  • Setting clearer timelines and benchmarks for neighborhood improvements

  • Creating consistent community check-ins around major projects

  • Improving transparency around implementation and budgeting

  • Tracking outcomes and adjusting policies when they are not working

  • Strengthening public trust through responsiveness and accountability

Good governance is not only about passing policy. It is about whether residents can actually feel the results in their daily lives.

Aidan smiling with glasses and dreadlocks walking on a city sidewalk, dressed in a gray suit, floral shirt, and teal bow tie.

Looking Ahead for Berkeley

Berkeley is changing whether we plan carefully or not.

The question is not whether growth and change will happen. The question is whether those changes will strengthen the city for the people who already live here, or continue shifting costs onto residents while public trust erodes.

I believe Berkeley can grow while remaining livable, diverse, accessible, and community-centered. But that requires planning that is grounded in neighborhood realities, public accountability, infrastructure investment, and long-term stability.

It also requires leadership that is willing to be honest about tradeoffs, responsive to residents, and focused on implementation instead of slogans.

I’m running because I care deeply about Southside, public space, housing stability, and the future of Berkeley as a place where people from different backgrounds and income levels can continue building community together.

This campaign is about helping shape a city that remains functional, humane, welcoming, and accountable for the long term.

I’m ready to do that work with you.

Your neighbor,

Aidan Hill

District 7 Candidate